Looks very good actually.  I think a little tweak of the Makefile is all 
that needs to be done,. The other two errors I think are caused by 
permission problems with the Oracle user who is doing the test.  I have seen 
similar ones with 10g instaltions.  But I an not 100% on that.  Sould be 
able to look at this this month.

Cheers
John Scoles

"Andy Hassall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Initial results:
>
> Default build method fails as the Oracle makefiles (oracle.mk etc.) have 
> apparently disappeared:
>
> Using Oracle in /Disk0/app/oracle/product/11.1.0
> DEFINE _SQLPLUS_RELEASE = "1101000600" (CHAR)
> Oracle version 11.1.0.6 (11.1)
>
>         Unable to locate an oracle.mk, proc.mk or other suitable *.mk
>         file in your Oracle installation.  (I looked in
>         /Disk0/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/rdbms/demo/demo_xe.mk 
> /Disk0/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/rdbms/lib/oracle.mk 
> /Disk0/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/rdbms/demo/oracle.mk 
> /Disk0/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/rdbms/demo/demo_rdbms.mk 
> /Disk0/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/precomp/demo/proc/proc.mk 
> /Disk0/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/precomp/demo/proc/demo_proc.mk 
> /Disk0/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/proc/lib/proc.mk 
> /Disk0/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/proc16/lib/proc16.mk under 
> /Disk0/app/oracle/product/11.1.0)
>
>
> However, building with "perl Makefile.PL -l" is successful.
>
> Tests are almost all successful, but there are some failures in the array 
> interface:
>
> t/26exe_array...........ok 3/14
> #   Failed test '... we should have 19 tuple_status'
> #   at t/26exe_array.t line 120.
> #          got: 10
> #     expected: 19
> t/26exe_array...........NOK 14/14
> #   Failed test '... we should have 48 rows'
> #   at t/26exe_array.t line 146.
> #          got: 30
> #     expected: 48
> # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 14.
> t/26exe_array...........dubious
>         Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
> DIED. FAILED tests 11, 14
>         Failed 2/14 tests, 85.71% okay
>
>
> Not sure what these are about yet - whether it's a bug in DBD::Oracle, 
> Oracle, or a backwards compatibility break in the OCI API.
>
> Other than those failures, the rest appears to pass tests and work OK 
> which is encouraging.
>
> -- 
> Andy Hassall :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://www.andyh.co.uk
> http://www.andyhsoftware.co.uk/space :: disk and FTP usage analysis tool 


Reply via email to