Thanks Tim. On Monday 07 Apr 2008, Tim Bunce wrote: > On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 04:25:03PM +0100, Tony Green wrote:
> > I have (apparently) successfully built and installed the DBD module, but > > when > > (s/DBD/DBI/ I presume.) OOPS! Yes, sorry. Lucky I proof-read my code better than my emails. > When you say "simulates an armel processor on X86", does it give you a > complete virtual machine that you login to? Where /usr/lib/... is > popuated only with libs for the armel processor? > > Or is it a cross-development platform, where you 'live' in an X86 > environment but the tools generate binaries that can be run on an armel > processor or via a simulator command? It's a virtual machine, so all the libs are (supposedly) correct for the armel. However, a bit more digging inspired by your suggestions shows that the problem appears to be due to picking up some incorrect libraries in the VM. It has libraries for both armel and i686 emulation but for some reason, when I'm trying to load the armel binary, the VM's trying to link to the i686 version of libc. Time to raise a bug with Nokia, I think. Thanks for your help. -- Tony Green Ipswich, Suffolk, England http://www.beermad.org.uk http://no2id-ip.web-brewer.co.uk ** This message is digitally signed. If your email client is unable to read digital signatures, you may see an attachment that you cannot open. See http://www.gnupg.org/(en)/documentation/faqs.html for more information. You can validate my PGP key from my website: http://www.beermad.org.uk/ * No Micro$oft products were used in the generation of this communication
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
