Well, yes, but only the general comment that these catalog methods ought to
return consistent values across different types of underlaying
databases/drivers.
And, I'm looking forward to the Unify implementation and the associated docs as
well :)
Todd Zervas
tazer...@earthlink.net
-----Original Message-----
>From: "H.Merijn Brand" <h.m.br...@xs4all.nl>
>Sent: Mar 8, 2010 12:54 AM
>To: dbi-dev@perl.org
>Subject: Re: column_info () vs type_info ()
>
>On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:10:53 +0100, "H.Merijn Brand"
><h.m.br...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
>> I see a big difference in what $sth->{TYPE} returns (and the name) and
>> what column_info () - if implemented - is returning.
>
>Does no-one have an opinion on this?
>
>I'd like to finish the Unify implementation.
>And maybe even add some docs to DBI
>
>--
>H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger http://amsterdam.pm.org/
>using & porting perl 5.6.2, 5.8.x, 5.10.x, 5.11.x on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00,
>11.11, 11.23, and 11.31, OpenSuSE 10.3, 11.0, and 11.1, AIX 5.2 and 5.3.
>http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org/
>http://qa.perl.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
