On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 03:18:15PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> 2010/6/16 Tim Bunce <tim.bu...@pobox.com>:
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:41:27AM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> >> 2010/6/16 Tim Bunce <tim.bu...@pobox.com>:
> >> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:10:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> >> >> Hi Tim,
> >> >>
> >> >> from my point of view, the current trunk of DBI is ready to be shipped
> >> >> as next development release.
> >> >
> >> > Not in MANIFEST: t/51dbm_file.t
> >> > Not in MANIFEST: t/52dbm_complex.t
> >> >
> >> > Should they be in the MANIFEST?
> >>
> >> They should, my fault. I'll do it now.
> >>
> >> > > Because it should be uploaded together with the development release of
> >> > > SQL::Statement, we should synchronize our uploads.
> >> >
> >> > Please tell me more about this. Why synchronize?
> >>
> >> DBI has test-depends (and recommendation) for SQL::Statement 1.28
> >> and S::S has test-depends on DBI 1.612.
> >
> > I think the DBI shouldn't have test-depends for SQL::Statement.
> > The recommendation is fine though.
> 
> It has a test-depends - but the tests are skipped if S::S is not available.
> My though was in the direction "I want to have the feedback from CPAN
> testers regarding the new S::S".

I don't see a test-depends on S::S in the DBI's Makefile.PL.
Only a recommends (plus a conflicts for SQL::Statement => 1.27).

> >> Some tests in DBI work only with SQL::Statement (and vice versa).
> >
> > Okay, but they're skipped if SQL::Statement isn't defined (right?)
> > so the tests don't strictly *depend* on SQL::Statement.
> 
> No, they're simply skipped (or fallback to DBI::SQL::Nano) without
> SQL::Statement.  I want to see if there're more incompatibilities like
> that one from Birmingham.pm.  Those are not discovered without SQL::Statement 
> :)
>
> Can you upload a DBI-1.611_92 now (with 2 more tests and the fixed Changes)?

Done. But there's no need to wait for those results as there are some
windows failures on 1.611_91 that need fixing:

http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=DBI%201.611_91;reports=1;os=MSWin32

Tim.

Reply via email to