On Jun 27, 2013, at 8:16 PM, Lyle wrote: > On 27/06/2013 22:22, Tim Bunce wrote: >> If you're a DBD::mysql user and care about the future of the code, please >> help out. > > I felt the same when I came across this during my research. I didn't have a > great deal of luck in my initial efforts to reach out. It seems like > Oracle/MySQL have lost a lot of interested in DBD::mysql (hence my post about > this a couple of months back).
Wait. That thread was about your belief that Oracle was trying to distance itself from DBD::mysql or discourage its development. Which it is not. It's simply that DBD::mysql is not an Oracle product. Oracle is not responsible to fix DBD::mysql bugs. That said, if your next statement is correct, that'd be great. > However, it does appear that some activity has come back. I'm not sure if > anyone looked at my patch, but I have since realised that there was a lot > more amiss. DBD::mysql really needs to be updated for proper MySQL *5* > support. > > I was talking to Peter about extra hacking sessions at our last Perl meet. > I'll make sure this is on the agenda. Good, thanks. > > > Lyle >
