On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:19:03 -0500, David Nicol <davidn...@cpan.org> wrote:
> I look forward to being able to brag that DBIx::bind_param_inline is > "Approved by the Berlin DBI Committee" or equivalent. As there is no, never was, nor will there be a "Berlin DBI Committee" feel free to brag as you wish :P What *will* be published is a document with advisories on how module authors are expected to behave once there modules are "hot". The document will have three levels of advice * New modules should do/have/follow/... * Modules that are heavily depended on should do/have/follow/... * Core- and toolchain modules should do/have/follow/... The document is there to serve a list of Best Practices and make the module authors maintainers and co-maintainer be more aware of what their changes might/will cause downriver. -- H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger http://amsterdam.pm.org/ using perl5.00307 .. 5.21 porting perl5 on HP-UX, AIX, and openSUSE http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org/ http://qa.perl.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
pgp7fG9PjhtUe.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
