> From: Janet Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2004/07/13 Tue PM 07:47:21 GMT
>
> Thanks to all who replied. I ended up selling out and using
> Win32::ODBC. If it ends up being too slow, I can always go back to
> Unix and try DBD::Sybase.
That, in my opinion, is not the best option. I wrote several scripts,
and one small webapp, using Win32::ODBC, which _is_ a good module.
However, I've had *much* better performance, and more importantly
for what I'm doing, a higher degree of portability. I would like to
suggest that you give it a try, using DBD::ODBC, instead of Win32::ODBC...
v/r,
amonotod
--
`\|||/ amonotod@ | subject line:
(@@) charter.net | no perl, no read...
ooO_(_)_Ooo________________________________
_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|
