Meanwihle I see something clearer.

Seeing that my "database related errors" based on a misconfigured
application and not on Oracle or DBD problems, I recognized that our error
message doesn't mean what it says. And this could be a good finding relate
to the libclntsh.so.10.1 issue.

The behaviour of my test environment lets draw a possible conclusion: The
error message "Can't load libclntsh.so.10.1 ... permission denied" causes
not only in libclntsh.so.10.1 itself but in files, libclntsh.so.10.1 has
access to. "Can't load libclntsh.so.10.1 ... permission denied" possibly
means "Can't initialize or execute libclntsh.so.10.1 properly, whatever
needed file has less permission rights".

To validate my assumption, I installed on C-System the Perl-Interpreter
including DBI/DBD I tested with on D-System. But on C-System I had no chance
to replicate permission problems. All works fine.

What could it be? A forgotten execution of root.sh or something else during
installation of oracle's admin client? 

Ralph Wecks

________________________________

B-I-T GmbH              
Beratung fuer Informationsmanagement und Telekommunikation      
Essener Straße 1         D-30173 Hannover       
Telefon: +49(0)511 80 71 90-0    Telefax: +49(0)511 80 71 90-25 
________________________________


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Peter J. Holzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. September 2007 10:06
An: dbi-users@perl.org
Betreff: Re: dynamic lib ignored even after "found" in
"install_driver(Oracle) failed: Can't load..." cgi problem

On 2007-09-03 19:42:10 +0200, Ralph Wecks wrote:
> It looks like permission issue - but I think it is not.
> 
> For validation purposes I installed 2 SUN Enterprises (called C- and 
> D-System), both with
> - Solaris 10
> - Oracle 10.2.0 (Admin Client)
> - DBI 1.58
> - DBD Oracle 1.19
> - our application

[C works, D doesn't. Probably irrelevant differences in installed software
snipped]

> Trying to logon to our form management's database the message "Cant't 
> load Oracle.so ... libclntsh.so.10.1 not found ..." appears. But all 
> permissions seemed to be sufficient. So I enabled webserver daemon's 
> profile and logged in as webservd. Walking through oracle's 
> directories I made a cat
> libclntsh.so.10.1 at .../lib32. Yery interesting content but no 
> permission problem.
> 
> At this point, it seems that the error message would be correct:
> - After running a chmod -R 777 on the /oracle directory the logon 
> procedure works fine
> - Revoking permission with a chmod -R 755 /oracle didn't had any 
> effect, logon goes on
> - After chmod -R 644 on .../lib32 logon works fine furthermore
> - Logon failed again with "libclntsh.so.10.1 not found" after running 
> a chmod -R 644 on /oracle
> 
> Some functions, procedures or what ever in the oracle dbm tree 
> obviously needs executable rights.

You haven't written where your libraries are installed, but from /oracle and
.../lib32 I conclude that the path to libclntsh.so.10.1 is something like
/oracle/.../lib32/libclntsh.so.10.1 (probably
/oracle/app/oracle/product/client/lib32/libclntsh.so.10.1, but it doesn't
matter much what's between oracle and lib32). To access files in a
directory, a process needs execute permissions on that directory.

So by changing the permissions on /oracle to 644, you were preventing all
root processes from accessing everything below that directory. If that works
on your "C" system, then either your application is running as root or it is
really using a different oracle client installation.

Basically the same is true for .../lib32. If that directory has permissions
644, no non-root process can access the files in it, which means that
libclntsh.so.10.1 cannot be loaded. However, if your application was already
running at the time you did the chmod, it was already loaded and continued
to work as long as it could access other files below /oracle which it needed
to open at runtime (e.g., tnsnames.ora).

        hp

-- 
   _  | Peter J. Holzer    | If I wanted to be "academically correct",
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR       | I'd be programming in Java.
| |   | [EMAIL PROTECTED]      | I don't, and I'm not.
__/   | http://www.hjp.at/ |   -- Jesse Erlbaum on dbi-users

Reply via email to