On 4/3/06, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see why I need to do that. If the f_class' PK is (id_one, id_two) I'm > happy for belongs_to 'foo' => 'Foo' to create foo_id_one and foo_id_two > columns.
I really can't think of any better convention than this suggestion of yours. However you'd still need to have syntax for manually specifying them. > I also want to have the 'reverse' attr on a belongs_to rather than explicit > has_many calls - saves us having circular loading failure issues and means > that the parent class can be re-used *without* the child class if suitable. Yes, this makes sense. But how is this related to the previous comment? (Or it is not?) -Nilson Santos F. Jr. _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/
