Hi,
In InstantCRUD I've migrated from putting the labels (and other
visuals) into the DBIC structures. It just felt not really clean
having the presentation parts in the database layer.
--
Zbyszek
On 11/2/06, John Napiorkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Right now if I stuff extra things into the column
metadata info like so:
__PACKAGE__->add_columns(
"thumbnail_path",
{
data_type => "VARCHAR",
default_value => "",
is_nullable => 0,
size => 255,
label => "Thumbnail Path",
field_type=>"Textfield",
},
I can retrieve that via the result_source column info
method. My question is do people think me putting my
metadata here is a bad idea, in the sense that in some
future revision of DBIx the metadata will have some
sort of enforcement and won't support my arbitrary key
values anymore?
Thanks!
John
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business
(http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com)
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
--
Zbigniew Lukasiak
http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
