Steven Mackenzie wrote:
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-03 09:50]:
Anybody got any suggestions on a new name? construct_as maybe?
`accessor_name`?
Regards,
'accessor_name' isn't really appropriate becuase the docs state that no
actual accessor is created, and you must use ->get_column('<name>'.)
Although it would seem sensible to change the behaviour to create the
accessor wouldn't it? Is there a reason that no accessor is created at
the moment?
Yes, because generating random accessors all over your classes without you
asking for them would be a horrific bug source.
Or
'is':
I quite like 'is', actually.
--
Matt S Trout Offering custom development, consultancy and support
Technical Director contracts for Catalyst, DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for more information
+ Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
