On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:40:04PM +0100, Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek wrote: > Hartmaier Alexander said: > > 'accessor' would be confusing, because no perl accessor is generated, so > > something like 'column_names' would be optimal imho. > > column_names++;
I read the cookbook a few days ago and thought "as" made sense. But, column_names is probably more explicit. And it's a lot easier to search for "column_names" than "as" in the docs. -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
