Matt S Trout wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:25:16PM +0200, Bernhard Graf wrote: > > So since find() is not designed to return lists, to be consistent > > it should always return a single value: either a row object or > > undef. > > > > Objections? > > I'm now convinced. > > Patch and test please, if you get 'em in by the end of the week we > can try it for the 08 rc cycle and see if it breaks anybody's code.
Looking at the code brings me to this question: Shouldn't next() and single() return undef instead of empty list for "not found" too? -- Bernhard Graf _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
