On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 08:43:20AM +0100, Ash Berlin wrote: > > brett gardner wrote: > > > I think I have found a bug with search_literal. If you get a resultset > > > that came from a search_literal, and try to apply another search_literal > > > to it, the bind values are in the wrong order eg.
I think this is what I've been seeing, with a subsequent ordinary search. But I'm not completely sure, there are bugs in my code too ... > Plus a doc patch saying "this only exists for Class::DBI compatibility, do > -not- use in normal DBIx::Class code". What, search_literal ? -- Richard Robinson "The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
