On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:55:39AM +0100, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I think everyone agrees that it would be good to have introspection
> for many to many relationships (to list all of those relations or
> check if a method is an accessor for such relationship). I do
> understand that many to implemented in a different way from 'normal'
> relations and the standard ->relationships and ->relationship_info
> calls on DBIx::Class::ResultSource might not be easily adopted for
> many to many. So what I would propose is
> for example: ->many2many_relationships and
> ->many2many_relationship_info methods. I remember that Matt asked me
> to make it compatible with future Moose DBIC implementation. I have
> no experience with Moose - but I don't see why this should not be.
My basic issue is that it doesn't really belong on the result_source
exactly.
But it probably shouldn't be a class method either.
Er.
I'd really rather just make it meta-object introspection in a Moose
port tbh.
I think we should look at a roundup of what we're going to try and get
into 0.09 in what order once 08100 ships.
You ok waiting until then?
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
Technical Director http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Want a managed development or deployment platform?
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
