Looks like the original poster decided to hit reply in a Schema::Loader thread so his patch got missed.
Should we apply this? Are we better off doc'ing in copy() itself what cascade_copy does and then having the relationship docs just mention when they turn it on? ----- Forwarded message from Paul Makepeace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- ARGH! Would you pretty please consider applying this year old patch to an even older feature that doesn't appear anywhere at all in the docs? http://osdir.com/ml/lang.perl.modules.dbix-class/2007-03/msg00106.html Paul -- Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project? Technical Director http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/ Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Want a managed development or deployment platform? http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/ _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
