Iain Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 12:06 +0200, BUNK (Jacob Bunk Nielsen) wrote: >> Perhaps, but it also ignores any mentioning of 'count'. This doesn't >> seem logical to me. Do you have any idea why it ignores count? > > The max is obviously causing a problem, how about a different approach? > > ** untested ** > [ ... ] > ** untested ** > > Should get you the max count, but the method may not be to your liking.
This approach works. However, I don't like it very much. It doesn't have the niceness factor I usually associate with dbix-class. Best regards Jacob _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
