Matt S Trout wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 08:30:49PM +0200, Bernhard Graf wrote: > > /me wrote: > > > Wouldn't it be better if $self->is_changed is consulted first in > > > DBIx::Class::TimeStamp? > > > > I took DBIx::Class::TimeStamp version 0.05 (the one w/o > > DynamicDefault) and modified the code to DWIM: > > That's nice. 0.05 still isn't coming back though.
OK. How about 0.07? -- Bernhard Graf _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
