Andreas Mock wrote: > > <snip> > > Don't understand me wrong. I just wanted to give you the sight of an first > visitor. > You know yourself that the first impression counts. ;-) > I took the time to join the mailing list and writing down my two errors I got > wile testing. I'm sure that there are many people out there which would cancel > a proof of concept right after the failing tests and never giving feedback. >
This is why we try to tend to such test failure reports and do appreciate them. Thanks for staying with us while we got to the bottom of it. > The do-subroutine of DBD::DB2 calls SUPER::do when there are more parameters > (in case of attributes). > DBI::do does a dbh->prepare with much more parameters as the external API > (docu) says. When > DBI::do does call prepare is calls DBD::DB2::prepare which ignores the > additional parameters. > > I don't know who is responsible for that. > Fact is: DBD::DB2 does not fulfill the API. And you're right! ;) > IMHO DBI does something which is not a good style for OO-programming. > I will try to contact the DBD::DB2 guys. Earliest still available version of DBI was released 10 years ago. There ought to be quite a number of peculiarities. So do you now have any remaining issues with installing DBIC or is everything more or less resolved? Thanks for the input. _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[email protected]
