Ovid wrote: > --- On Fri, 11/12/09, Rob Kinyon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Rob Kinyon <[email protected]> > >> This looks to be the mythical "might_belong_to" >> relationship type that >> hasn't been defined yet. might_have is the LEFT JOIN >> version of >> has_many. What you want is belongs_to( ..., { join_type >> => 'LEFT' } ); > >>From DBIx::Class::RelationShip: > > might_have > > Arguments: $accessor_name, $related_class, > $their_fk_column|\%cond|\...@cond?, \%attrs? > Creates an optional one-to-one relationship with a class. > > That "one-to-one" is wrong? Is this a doc error?
It isn't, but it is grossly misleading. There are some ideas how to make it clearer. _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[email protected]
