Hi, On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:53 PM, fREW Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > It may be too late at this point, but DBICx is not the preferred namespace. > Typically we use DBIx::Class::Foo instead.
Sure, but I prefer to try out the ideas in the DBICx namespace first, i don't like to polute the DBIx::Class namespace. If/when this is something worh doing in the DBIx::Class namespace, I'll release a version that starts using that, and I'll keep the other for backwards compatibility with a deprecation warning. > Also, you basically made a global schema if I'm reading this right. This is > just one schema at a time by design then? Right now,yes. But that was a copy of the old code. I didn't need more than that. I do have a branch (needs more tests) that switch that to a "schema per instance"-mode. > Because sometimes it's great that > we can have the same schema connected to more than one db at once... Agreed, in my current project I'll need that too. I'll try and push the code tomorow if I have the time. if not, I'll do it during the weekend. Bye, -- Pedro Melo http://www.simplicidade.org/ xmpp:[email protected] mailto:[email protected] _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[email protected]
