Bill Moseley wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Peter Rabbitson <[email protected] > <mailto:rabbit%[email protected]>> wrote: > > > This means you didn't even read the original thread, which clearly > mentioned > > http://search.cpan.org/~frew/DBIx-Class-0.08121/lib/DBIx/Class/Row.pm#has_column_loaded > > > It was four days ago, I forgot. Sorry. If I would have remembered I > guess I would have know you were implying earlier today "Ordered should > be checking has_column_loaded()". In that case I'll try later today to > create a failing test. > > > > > Although now the database takes more of a beating... ;) > > > http://dev.catalystframework.org/svnweb/bast/blame/DBIx-Class/0.08/trunk/lib/DBIx/Class/Ordered.pm > Read the comment at lines 791-794, I need a volunteer to make me a > list of databases > which can do that without stepping on its own toes. Then we can make > exceptions based > on underlying storage. > > > Geeze, reduced to the lowest common denominator. What about a flag to > indicate that it's ok to do it the smart way? >
To which I said: > I need a volunteer to make me a list of databases which can do that without > stepping on its own toes. Then we can make exceptions based on underlying > storage. Remember DBIC is correct first and fast only afterwards. This is far from the only "lowest common denominator" reduction in the code, but we currently still have trouble to test multiple databases. Work is being done on that front but it is sadly slow. _______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[email protected]
