> > I note you use the term 'ascendants' which is not a real word and so would > be confusing. Is this the same as 'ancestors'? If so then it would be best > to use ancestors since that is a word know by other people and it keeps it > consistent with other similar modules. >
> Are you sure? I found ascendant in Webster. Though i'm not a native > English speaker, I was thinking it was more coherent to oppose with > descendant. But it would be easy to fix that anyway. > For what it's worth I *am* a native English speaker and I think that ancestors would be a lot more comprehensible. I don't think I've ever heard the word ascendants used... -- fREW Schmidt http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com
_______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[email protected]
