On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Rob Kinyon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Although this advice wasn't because of avoiding this bug, it's
> generally considered to be a "Bad Plan"™ to make a relationship name
> the same as the foreign-key column you're using to fetch on.
Take it from someone who made this mistake long ago and is still paying for
it. If I try to switch the relationship names, I'm dooming myself to endless
bugfixes. :( I think newer D:C::Schema::Loader versions use different names,
"${column}_rel" IIRC.
The repeated get_column() calls are ugly, ugly, ugly. Worse, forgetting to
use get_column() potentially means I add more unneeded load on the database.
Drew
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[email protected]
