>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Green <[email protected]> writes:
Jim> Hello,
Jim> when I was reading about moose and orm I found dbic will be based on
Jim> moose in next major release. I am currently using RDBO and was
Jim> satisfied with it with some exceptions(no sybase support right now, no
Jim> potential move to moose)..
Jim> RDBO has performance advantage compared with DBIC according to this
Jim> benchmark http://code.google.com/p/rose/wiki/RDBOBenchmarks. Since I
Jim> like moose and would like to have a standard/popular orm with moose as
Jim> base. Could anyone convince me that DBIC performance penalty is minor
Jim> compared with its potential integration with moose, also with moose
Jim> integration I guess the performance will be hit?
I'd really like to see the actual code from the benchmarks (not an
mst-signed advertisement). There are plenty of ways to optimize the raw
DBIC methods/accessors.
--
Eden Cardim
Software Engineer
Shadowcat Systems Ltd.
http://www.shadowcat.co.uk
http://blog.edencardim.com
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[email protected]
