Oooops, my fault:
DBIx::Class: version 0.08123.
Multiple tables -> OK, but _lots_ of tables? I tend to associate
"multiple" with something in the couples, perhaps tens. But for >100
I tend to speak about "lots" :-)
Regards
J.
 |
Jorge González Villalonga
Director Técnico
DAIKON Integración y
Desarrollo S.L.
Telf: (+34) 91 188 08 28
Fax: (+34) 91 632 65 42
www.daikon.es |
El 28/02/11 16:02, Peter Rabbitson escribió:
Jorge
Gonzalez wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing an app with Catalyst 5.80024, on perl 5.8.8, 32 bits;
DBIx::Class models.
Also you didn't mention the most important factor - which version of
DBIx::Class itself were you using? There are currently no known
slowdowns
while working with multiple tables.
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive:
http://www.grokbase.com/group/[email protected]
|
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[email protected]
