Okay. So, it sounds like feeding an array to the ? placeholder in a query like "IN( ? )" is not supported by the existing binding methods -- instead I would need to provide alternatives like "IN( ? )", "IN( ?, ? )", "IN( ?, ?, ? )", etc.
thanks for the feedback, Bill On Mar 28, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Ben Tilly wrote: > The number of bind parameters in the query has to match the number of > parameters passed in. If you want to follow this approach you'll need > to either dynamically create the query on the fly to match the > request, or else pre-create versions with different numbers of bind > parameters and use the correct one.
_______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/[email protected]
