On 10/12/2016 04:01 PM, David Golden wrote:
It would be helpful if we could go through your last update and
understand if there is still outstanding work you feel you could
David, you vacated my position as a "project owner", so there is nothing
to deliver in this capacity. Your wording seems to place me on the hook
for some work that I am obligated to perform, which I find... strange.
The specific technical questions you raised have answers, but they are
really gnarly and complex, and require a dialog to fully grasp the
crucial details. This isn't the thread (nor likely the forum - IRC is
more suitable) to have such a dialog. Whenever someone steps up to
actually start working on anything - I will be there with specifics, as
long as the actual implementor is interested in hearing them.
Additionally as I said elsewhere I still plan to:
* Regardless of what happens (and whether there is reasonable demand to
implementing anything extra), I intend to produce a general codebase
walkthrough, hopefully ready by the start of November. While I don't
want to hype it up, I intend for its level of detail to dwarf that of
. This has been in planning for quite some time and the tools needed
to pull this off have been in development for a while as well.
This should round up any "loss of knowledge" concerns that the wider
community could have.
I also must put this in perspective: nobody has done anything even
remotely similar for any project that I know of, especially in such a
situation. Let's... ease the pointy questions and the demands?
Searchable Archive: http://email@example.com