On 10/31/2016 01:39 PM, David Golden wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Andrew Beverley <a...@andybev.com <mailto:a...@andybev.com>> wrote:- RIBASUSHI retains the current namespace Peter previously said that he would only continue if all other maintainers relinquished their claims to the DBIC namespace [1]. Could you please clarify your proposal with details on that front and what is to happen should Peter be unable or unwilling to continue working on DBIC? If Peter agrees and your proposal carries, I don't want to be in a situation where we have to have this debate again if he decides to take his "well deserved retirement" after all (regardless of whether immediately after the permissions change or some unknown time in the future).
Same here (wrt not wanting to re-live this situation again). I will respond to the above points around midnight UTC ( ~11h from now ).
_______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
