On 11/02/2016 10:11 AM, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote:
> On 11/02/2016 10:07 AM, Paul Mooney wrote:
>> On 02.11.2016 09:02, Dave Cross wrote:
>>> Quoting Matthias Zeichmann <matthias.zeichm...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Charlie Garrison <garri...@zeta.org.au>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 1 Nov 2016, at 19:48, Thomas Klausner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think a fork will not work. The "old" DBIC will stagnate, the "new"
>>>>>> will not gain traction. Everybody loses.
>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed. Another,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> same here
>>>>
>>>> -1 for forking, +1 for the original proposal
>>>
>>> Mee too.
>>>
>>> +1 Matt's proposal (new project team)
>>> -1 Andrew's proposal (forking)
>>
>> Same here:
>>
>> +1 Matt's proposal
>> -1 to forking
>>
>
> +1 Matt's proposal
> +1 to forking
>
Sorry, the choices were confused by me - so my corrected vote is
+1 Matt's proposal (new project team)
-1 to forking
Regards
Racke
--
Ecommerce and Linux consulting + Perl and web application programming.
Debian and Sympa administration.
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
