I just started modifying the class already - there are some questions
there:

Is there any sense in deriving from that class (because currently most
functions are protected virtual)?

Also about member variables - is there any "standard" way to name them
- since currently they are named in the same style as local variables
and I don't like that a lot - currently I am using mMemberVariable.

Done some experimenting about the GetTables() function - my
Conclusions (just copied the comment):

//If the DataContext was a strong typed one (derived with fields for
the tables),
//it returns a list of MetaTables for all this tables.
//But if you call GetTable<T> with an additional table - the table
doesn't get added to this list.
//If you use a vanilla DataContext the list is empty at the beginning
(ok no surprise here),
//if you call GetTable<T> here the table is added to the list.
//
//If you add to properties with the same T of Table<T> only the first
gets into the list.


The database name seems to be either the name of the attribute or the
class name, not null if the attribute is not available.


And is there something like an Continuous Integration Server for this
Project?




On Oct 16, 5:38 pm, "Pascal Craponne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> I came to the same conclusion. Our current AttributedMetaModel doesn't work
> dynamically, and it should (just like linq to sql does). The problem to be
> solved is that currently, the class reads all tables, then all associations
> between tables. The idea would be to merge the two steps so we can have a
> method that registers a table, its associations and related tables.
> I was planning to work on it soon, but let me know if you want to fix the
> code by yourself.
>
> Pascal.
> --
> Pascal.
>
> jabber/gtalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DbLinq" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to