This could just be simply short names, instead of fully qualified type names, at least for some known providers. It is like we can specify a CodeDomProvider in xsd command (/l option).
Atsushi Eno Jiri Moudry wrote: > So in the Mono scheme, we will have the System.Data.Linq contain > multiple IVendor implementations? Then I don't think a single config > variable "DbLinqProvider" is enough. > > Maybe I should change it to two config variables, similar to: > connectionString = > "DbLinqProviderAssembly=System.Data.Linq.dll,DbLinqProviderClass=PgsqlVendor;server=x;UID=y;..." > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
