The patch caused no regression, so I committed it.It is in SVN rev 956. Thanks for your contribution.
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 13:09, Eugene Kotlyarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi > > Pascal Craponne wrote: > > > > does this solve all missing PK problems? > > > It works for me, as far as a understand logic of this code PK is required > only if there are some foreign keys that reference it, and if there are no > references there is no reason to try to get value of PK. > Here is patch made against current SVN > > > > -- Pascal. jabber/gtalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
