OK, that sounds fine. Do you think the Firebird or SQLite provider is closer to primetime? Both dbs fit my needs.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 4:17 AM, Pascal Craponne <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > are you crazy? I have no idea :) > A lot of tests still fail, and there are currently unimplemented features, > such as: > - transactions > - complex subexpressions > > Anyway simple expressions work, inserts, updates work, so your website > could probably work with DbLinq for SQLite. > > Pascal. > > jabber/gtalk: [email protected] > msn: [email protected] > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
