Hi Jon,
2. I need to review this. By default I'm strongly opposed to any addition in
an assembly to be tested (I don't say "no", I say "I need to review").

Regarding DbMet

Pascal.

jabber/gtalk: [email protected]
msn: [email protected]



On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 04:29, Jonathan Pryor <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Do we have any criteria for merging the tests-without-db branch with
> trunk?
>
> This branch does three things:
>
> 1. Split up the tests/Test_NUnit directory into a bunch of per-assembly
> projects, placed under src/[AssemblyToTest]/Test (e.g. src/DbLinq/Test,
> src/DbLinq.SqlServer/Test, etc.).
>
> 1.a: This also moves tests/DbLinqTest into src/DbLinq/Test.
> 1.b: This also moves tests/Northwind DBMLs/*.dbml into the appropriate
> src/[Assembly]/Test directory, e.g. tests/Northwind
> DBMLs/NorthwindMySql.dbml into src/DbLinq.MySql/Test/NorthwindMySql.dbml.
>
> 2. Add the testing framework proposed at
> http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq/browse_thread/thread/7e848fe6655f0c01.
> This required a few changes in design, such as adding a
> DbLinq.SqlServer_test_ndb project to test the DbLinq.SqlServer functionality
> sans database (necessary because of the heavy use of Reflection within
> ObjectFactory et al).
>
> 3. "Minor" project fixes to allow DbLinq_StudioExpress.sln to be loaded
> without warnings (Removal of the DbLinq.Localization project reference,
> etc.).
>
> What this does *not* fix is the DbMetal.exe/DbMetal.dll testing "oddity"
> outlined at:
> http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq/browse_thread/thread/b1639edd4e86a2ed
>
> If possible, I would like to merge this branch with trunk.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> - Jon
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DbLinq" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to