Is this code that runs frequently? Or is it only used when classes are built for dbml?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Giacomo Tesio <[email protected]> wrote: > That's surely important, but since that code seem to me quite complex I was > wondering if it was the next block to optimize. > > That said, I absolutely can not waste time... > > If you already know there is no better way to make that work done, I will > go for other place to look. > I've already saw that, given that design, the code is as efficient as it > can be. > > But since that they are heavyly used types (and since the Format() method > signature is so similar to the String one), I was wondering if we could > optimize it by making it faster. > > May be, by redesign it, if the advantage is big enougth. > > > What do you think about that? I'm completely misleading? > > > Giacomo > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Pascal Craponne <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I wrote those classes, and their main purpose was to handle databases like >> Ingres that don't support named parameters. With these classes parameters >> can be identified and ordered to provide correct SQL statements. Until >> someone finds a more efficient solution, I suggest to keep them :) >> >> Pascal. >> >> jabber/gtalk: [email protected] >> msn: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 17:56, Giacomo Tesio <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It seem to me that by using plain strings instead of those classes would >>> be more efficent. >>> >>> But may be I'm missing something, so before starting a refactoring which >>> could be really complex and had great impact on the existing code, I'd like >>> to know why it's has been designed so. >>> >>> Can anyone explain me what I'm missing? >>> >>> >>> Giacomo >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
