I've found, it was a stupid question. Sorry! Patience with me, will give you the Paradise! :-D
Giacomo On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Giacomo Tesio <[email protected]> wrote: > Why DbLinq has it's own implementation of such types? > > Is it about their implementation? > > > Giacomo > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
