That was my thought too. I don't know how you'd hook an event to something that doesn't happen. Plus you're making more work for your database on the backend.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Pascal Craponne <[email protected]> wrote: > What sense does it make, updating properties that haven't changed? > Pascal. > > jabber/gtalk: [email protected] > msn: [email protected] > > > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 00:47, r3tr0but10n <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Will DbLinq support only updating properties that changed instead of >> updating all properties? >> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
