You can remove the references (I added them).
Pascal.

jabber/gtalk: [email protected]
msn: [email protected]



On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 21:56, Jonathan Pryor <[email protected]> wrote:

>  I was looking into the licensing of
> Microsoft.VisualStudio.QualityTools.UnitTestFramework.dll, and wasn't
> comforted by what I found:
>
>
> http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/netfxsetup/thread/32384366-b668-4f18-99eb-9c67f7eef233/
>
>  Just in case anyone reads this - I called them, and since the unit testing
> portion of visual studio is not available as a separate download, it is
> licensed as part of the Visual Studio product.  It can then be distributed
> under an ISV license -- as though you were buying and distributing Visual
> Studio.
>
> Which by my reading requires a Visual Studio license be present in order to
> use the assembly.  Thus, it's a Bad Idea to have a copy of this in svn, as
> it (1) allows Express users to use the assembly (and Express users aren't
> licensed to use this assembly), and (2) allows #Develop and MonoDevelop
> users to use the assembly (which isn't Visual Studio *at all*).
>
> Thus, do we actually need this assembly?  Would it be safe to remove this
> assembly and instead depend upon NUnit for unit tests (which we're already
> largely doing anyway)?
>
> (I'm particularly interested/concerned as the DbMetal unit tests currently
> depend upon this assembly, and I don't want to copy the assembly into Mono
> to use the DbMetal tests within Mono.  I can certainly add #if 
> MONO_STRICTlogic to the appropriate tests to strip out the QualityTools 
> usage, but
> before I start adding more conditional logic I thought I'd see if it was
> needed at all...)
>
> Thanks,
> - Jon
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DbLinq" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to