Fix submitted. Please take a look to them...
Giacomo On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Giacomo Tesio <[email protected]> wrote: > Any comment or suggest? > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Giacomo Tesio <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've just summitted 3 test for tracking the implementation of this two >> features. >> http://code.google.com/p/dblinq2007/source/detail?r=1043 >> >> Yesterday I've located the EntityTracker inside the DataContext. >> Here my plan for changes: >> - Create a IEntityTraker interface. >> - Make EntityTraker implement IEntityTraker >> - Create a DisabledEntityTraker class, implementing IEntityTraker. >> - Create a private readonly property DataContext.EntityTraker >> - Make all references pointing to the entityTraker field, point to the new >> property >> - In the getter of DataContext.EntityTraker populate the entityTraker >> field according to the ObjectTrakingEnable value >> - When setting ObjectTrakingEnable, throws the proper exception if the >> entityTraker field is not null. >> >> >> All this work assume that the EntityTraker is the only cache of entities >> in the system, is this right? >> >> Moreover, I've no idea wher to look for disable deferred loading (lazy >> loading). >> >> Please let me know what you think about this... >> >> >> Giacomo >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Giacomo Tesio <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi... unfortunately I've found no time to take a better look to DbLinq >>> object tracking. >>> >>> Where are located the caches that should be disabled when >>> ObjectTrackingEnable is false? >>> >>> >>> Giacomo >>> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
