If you are able to fix such problems, all patches are welcome. DbLinq is a
very ambitious project, and is always looking for new contributors (=new
blood).

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 13:55, Alessandro Gambaro <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> We've used DbLinq in a project with oracle, dbmetal to generate the
> code and the only had these problems:
>
> 1 - An using error in the generated classes
> 2- Composite Keys not supported
> 3 - Transactions not support (we just used a common context
> carefully...)
>
> For the rest DbLinq worked very well.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On May 8, 1:40 pm, Pascal Craponne <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm not sure I understand: DbLinq is not an entity framework, it's the
> "linq
> > to sql" for other databases.
> > Apparently there is a but with string analysis (regarding you "OBJECT#").
> It
> > can be avoided by using /culture=IVL to DbMetal command line switches,
> but
> > I'm not sure the generated class will have a valid name anyway.
> >
> > Pascal.
> >
> > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 22:56, JA <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > so if i paid attention to the fact that in dblinq the goal is to
> > > develop linq to oracle (i.e linq to sql for Oracle) and not a EF
> > > provider i probably wouldnt need to ask this question.
> >
> > > so i used the /dbml on dbmetal to output a dbml file then dropped it
> > > into a vs project and this gets me into familiar grounds/context -
> > > even though im after a EF provider for Oracle.
> >
> > > thanks
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DbLinq" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to