On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Jonathan Pryor <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 14:39 +0200, Giacomo Tesio wrote: > > First becouse the member has no state by itself, and the constructor have > nothing to do with it (AFAIK) > > Alas, you're wrong. From uncommitted messages, I saw that most of the > Init() call overhead was due to the mappingSource.GetModel(GetType()) call > at the end of Init(). > Sorry... :-) > > 2. that fucking ObjectFactory... :-D > > Anyone know of an MIT/X11 IoC container? We might want to consider using a > real IoC container instead of the ObjectFactory wanna-be... > > Though do we really need IoC functionality at all? I'm dubious of its use > here... > This is something we could be better then l2sql... There are some interface that the user could like to reimplement (IQueryCache, for example :-D) The CommonServiceLocator is Ms-PL... but I do not know if it completely fit our needs. I'm thinking of the ObjectFactory.Create<T>()... Giacomo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
