Jonathan Pryor ripensò: > That said, --type isn't very clear; perhaps --output-type or > --generate-type would be better?
"--generate-type" seems the most sensible. > I do wonder why we have/need --entityInterfaces, though -- what's the > use case for wanting e.g. INotifyPropertyChanged but not > INotifyPropertyChanging? Or is it to prevent generating the IModified > interface? (By the way, I see an IModifiedImplementation type in > DbMetal, but not an IModified interface. I also don't see an IModified > interface in Mono, so I'm not even sure what this looks like...) It could be useful to add custom interfaces but, given that the generated classes are partial, one could add those in a partial declaration in his code. > So to a certain extent, I'm inclined to just remove --entityInterfaces > and just always generate the appropriate interfaces (both > INotifyPropertyChanged and INotifyPropertyChanging, as L2SQL does). I agree. Do you prefer breaking the command-line interface after 0.19 or should I start sending patches? -- Emanuele Aina Studio Associato Di Nunzio e Di Gregorio http://dndg.it/ Via Maria Vittoria, 2 10123 Torino - Italy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=.
