On 22/01/2010 21:06, Jonathan Pryor wrote: >> What? This was my first patch to dblinq and we're using dblinq with >> > connecton strings (cleaning connection string to be sure npgsql does not >> > receive anything extra). jonp, can you please point me to a test case >> > that shows how this does not work? > Behold! http://code.google.com/p/dblinq2007/issues/detail?id=177 > > The above reports two issues: (1) that in some circumstances Npgsql is > upper-casing the connection string keys (resulting in "DBLINQPROVIDER", > which isn't matched by our regex), and (2) newer versions of Npgsql > reject DbLinqProvider altogether. > > Not having a PostgreSQL server to try to reproduce with, the above is > all I have to go one, but it's apparently hit at least one person.
Thanks. I'll fix and commit during the week-end. federico -- Federico Di Gregorio [email protected] Io non sono romantica. La candelina sul tavolo mi vede e si spegne. -- sisterconfusion -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en.
