I admit that the "dbg" in the folder name threw me off at first. But if you really wanted to use the VS convention, then the bin-folder should remain within the project folder and then, i guess, you would have to go to the DbMetal folder to find all the dlls in one place. Personally, I don't particularly like the files being two levels down (e.g. bin/Debug) and on the other hand wouldn't like Release and Debug on the top level, so I guess, I'am happy with the current layout.
Anders On Mar 22, 10:19 pm, Jonathan Pryor <[email protected]> wrote: > (This may be an ill-fated "opinion" question...) > > Currently, all projects place their generated assemblies into the > top-level `build` or `build.dbg` directories (for Release or Debug > builds, respectively). > > The question: should we change this to follow normal VS convention, so > that Release builds are placed under `$topdir/bin/Release` for Release > builds and `$topdir/bin/Debug` for Debug builds? > > The primary reason would be to be more consistent with other projects > and expectations. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en.
