John, Thanks so much for these suggestions. I'll focus on this today. I really want this to work considering I have chosen MySQL as my datasource for a very important project. The solution works beautifully until i move it to a medium trust environment.
I like the idea of IOC, I think it's great, but like you, I do not feel that it is always the most beneficial solution, especially when developing in an environment which may or may not run on a medium trust environment. Though I must say that I was able to use IOC in a recent web app that was deployed to a medium trust environment. The app uses the Castle IOC. I mention this only to say that it is possible On Jul 15, 9:46 am, Jonathan Pryor <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 16:51 -0700, N!cky wrote: > > Have you found the solution to this problem? I just recently > > encountered it and haven't found a solution. > > I can guess; you can test and report back. ;-) > > My guess is that in your restricted AppDomain, Assembly.GetTypes() only > returns public types, while the sole IDataMapper implementation is > internal (and thus likely won't be returned). > > Unfortunately, there is no way to get internal types via some > Assembly.GetTypes() overload. > > Thus, a fix (that won't be accepted into svn) is to edit > src/DbLinq/Data/Linq/Sugar/Implementation/DataMapper.cs and make the > DataMapper type public instead of internal > > You will likely need to make other types public as well. > > This won't be accepted into DbLinq because that would require exporting > additional types from Mono's System.Data.Linq.dll, which would be an API > incompatibility. > > Two permanent solutions are: > > 1. Remove the ObjectFactory entirely, and rely on hard-coded types. > I'm in favor of this, as I don't see why IoC-like containers are > useful in the case of DbLinq. > > 2. Do as other types do, and change DataMapper to be: > > #if !MONO_STRICT > public > #endif > class DataMapper : IDataMapper {...} > > This will make DataMapper public in the default DbLinq build (yay?), but > I'm leery about making a "Implementation" type public (check the > namespace/directory). > > Again, I'm in favor of eventually removing the IoC stuff. > > - Jon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en.
