On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:35:48PM +0200, Ilja Booij wrote: > sorry, no transactions. I'd like for dbmail to use them, but currently > there is MySQL ISAM table support. These ISAM tables do not support > Transactions. > > Anyone have any thoughts on why we should keep support for ISAM tables > in dbmail? Dropping this and going of innoDB only on MySQL seems like a > good idea to me.
Any reason why it can't be determined at runtime whether or not to wrap queries in a transaction? xn
