On Friday, Oct 10, 2003, at 14:29 Europe/Amsterdam, Andreas Hopfenblatt wrote:

Hi,

As you recommanded, I retried it running ./configure
Here's the result (a little better, but not successful):

./configure --with-mysql
[snip ./configure output]
[snip make output]
Making all in auth
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..      -g -O2 -W -Wall -c `test -f
'authsql.c' || echo './'`authsql.c
authsql.c: In function `auth_getencryption':
authsql.c:231: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
authsql.c: In function `auth_check_user':
authsql.c:328: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
authsql.c: In function `auth_check_user_ext':
authsql.c:424: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
authsql.c: At top level:
authsql.c:632: syntax error before `char'
authsql.c:644: syntax error before `&'
authsql.c:644: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `time'
authsql.c:644: conflicting types for `time'
/usr/include/time.h:132: previous declaration of `time'
authsql.c:644: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
authsql.c:645: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `tm'
authsql.c:645: conflicting types for `tm'
authsql.c:639: previous declaration of `tm'
authsql.c:645: incompatible types in initialization
authsql.c:645: initializer element is not constant
authsql.c:645: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
authsql.c:646: syntax error before `sizeof'
authsql.c:646: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `strftime'
authsql.c:646: conflicting types for `strftime'
/usr/include/time.h:131: previous declaration of `strftime'
authsql.c:67: warning: `__auth_insert_result' used but never defined
[snip]

I think there's a problem with that time.h file. Is there anybody else who can test it on FreeBSD? I only have Debian Linux and Mac OS X machines to test on.

Nevertheless I think it's nice to have a build.sh script - as long as it
really is of any use.
But why is build.sh nice when you can use the configure script? What am I missing here? If there is a good reason to support it I will happily do so of course :)

Cheers,
Ilja

Reply via email to