On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 04:20:17PM +0000, Feargal Reilly wrote:
> Okay... didn't expect that much discussion, glad for it though.
> Turns out most of this comes down to your philosophy of what dbmail should do.
> 
> Christian Warden suggested using the -m flag of dbmail-smtp to deliver
> it to a seperate mailbox. I wasn't actually aware of that option as
> it's not mentioned in the man page, and it does the job pretty well
> (although it'll hurt my head to figure out the sendmail config...).

Ahh, there's the problem, your choice of MTA :)

> However, as Michael H?usler pointed out, it does have the limitation
> of being hard-coded in the MTA, whereas I believe it would be better
> to allow it to be optionally set by the end user. The potential for
> end-user configuration is one of the core strengths of dbmail in my
> eyes. Additionally, for those who have separate servers dedicated to
> scanning incoming mail, they may not with for the MTA on the dbmail
> host to spawn additional filtering mechanisms, and prefer to use a
> lightweight MTA to hand it on to dbmail.

The destination mailbox doesn't have to be hard-coded into the MTA.  For
example, I configured a transport (Exim) that takes addresses of the
form /username~mailbox/ and delivers them to the correct mailbox using
dbmail-smtp.  The mailbox to deliver to is the result of a
user-configurable filter which is stored in the users table in the
database.
 
> It certainly is a good alternative for people who are doing the
> scanning on the same server, and who don't care for end-user
> configurability, so I will add it to my 'things to document' list.
> 
> What didn't get discussed however, and I thought this would generate
> more controversy, was the idea of sending a summary to the user as
> part of the maintenance run. Do people think this should be part of
> dbmail-maintenance, or should it be a separate run?

I think separate.

> Finally, as I mentioned, I have no experience with IMAP, so should a
> spam mailbox be called 'Spam', '/Spam', or something else?

'Spam' is fine, or 'Quarantine/Spam' or similar.

xn

Reply via email to