I changed u64_t to int64_t because gcc -Wall started warning about:

auth/authldap.c:787:

  /* pass through any error from __auth_get_every_match() */
  return ( known < 0 ? known : 0 );

if known is unsigned this doesn't make any sense, does it ?

Anyway, I did some googling on u64_t, and only found some references to old minix docs AND dbmail !!! Is u64_t deprecated? Or else, where is it defined? And why doesn't dbmail use glib instead ?




Ilja Booij wrote:
done :)

BTW, why use the int64_t in auth_get_known_users()? Because
__auth_get_every_match() returns an int? I guess it would be better to let that function return an unsigned int. Or am I missing something here?

thanks for fixing those typos!

cheers,
Ilja

On Dec 3, 2003, at 1:31 PM, Paul J Stevens wrote:



Hi there,

I'm updating the experimental packages for dbmail-2 (sorry for the long delay).

I've had to fix some typos in authldap.c

Patch attached for your building pleasure. Ilja, can you commit this please ?



--
  ________________________________________________________________
  Paul Stevens                                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  NET FACILITIES GROUP                     GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
  The Netherlands_______________________________________www.nfg.nl
--- dbmail_cvs/auth/authldap.c    2003-12-03 11:03:50.000000000 +0100
+++ dbmail/auth/authldap.c    2003-12-03 12:51:17.000000000 +0100
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include "config.h"
 #endif

+#include "assert.h"
 #include "auth.h"
 #include "dbmail.h"
 #include "db.h"
@@ -40,7 +41,7 @@

 #define AUTH_QUERY_SIZE 1024

-extern char *configFile;
+static char *configFile = DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE;

 LDAP *_ldap_conn;
 LDAPMod **_ldap_mod;
@@ -88,6 +89,8 @@
trace(TRACE_DEBUG, #func ": value for " #val " stored in " #var " as [%s]", var) /* that's correct, no final ; so when the macro is called, it looks "normal" */

+static void __auth_get_config(void);
+
 static void __auth_get_config()
 {
   struct list ldapItems;
@@ -181,6 +184,7 @@
  * calls. OTOH, if the calls are always far between, we'd
  * rather just be connected strictly as needed...
  */
+int auth_reconnect(void);
 int auth_reconnect()
 {
   /* Destroy the old... */
@@ -628,7 +632,7 @@
   id_char = __auth_get_first_match( query, fields );

   *user_idnr = ( id_char ) ? strtoull( id_char, NULL, 0 ) : 0;
- trace(TRACE_DEBUG, "auth_user_exists(): returned value is [%llu]", id ); + trace(TRACE_DEBUG, "auth_user_exists(): returned value is [%llu]", user_idnr );

   if( id_char ) free( id_char );

@@ -686,7 +690,7 @@
   cid_char = __auth_get_first_match( query, fields );

   *client_idnr = ( cid_char ) ? strtoull( cid_char, NULL, 0 ) : 0;
- trace(TRACE_DEBUG, "auth_getclientid(): returned value is [%llu]", cid ); + trace(TRACE_DEBUG, "auth_getclientid(): returned value is [%llu]", client_idnr );

   if( cid_char ) free( cid_char );

@@ -742,7 +746,7 @@
  * return -2 on mem error, -1 on db-error, 0 on success */
 int auth_get_known_users(struct list *users)
 {
-  u64_t known;
+  int64_t known;
   /* u64_t curr; unused variable */
   char query[AUTH_QUERY_SIZE];
   char *fields[] = { _ldap_cfg.field_uid, NULL };
@@ -1675,7 +1679,7 @@
   if( ldap_err )
   {
trace(TRACE_ERROR,"auth_validate(): ldap_bind_s failed: %s", ldap_err2string( ldap_err ) );
-      id = 0;
+      user_idnr = 0;
   }
   else
   {
@@ -1715,11 +1719,11 @@
 //  struct list templist;
 //  struct element *tempelem1, *tempelem2, *tempelem3;
 //
-//  /* do the first entry here */
+//  // do the first entry here
 //  tempelem1 = list_getstart( retlist );
 //  count1 = retlist->total_nodes;
 //
-//  /* we'll get the next entry at the _end_ of the loop! */
+//  // we'll get the next entry at the _end_ of the loop!
 //  printf( "retlist has %d nodes\n", retlist->total_nodes );
 //  for( c1 = 0; c1 < count1; c1++ )
 //    {

--
IC&S
Stadhouderslaan 57
3583 JD Utrecht
telnr. 030-6355730
faxnr. 030-6355731

PGP-key:
http://www.ic-s.nl/keys/ilja.txt

_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev


--
  ________________________________________________________________
  Paul Stevens                                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  NET FACILITIES GROUP                     GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
  The Netherlands_______________________________________www.nfg.nl

Reply via email to